Statistical tests for multiple forecast comparison
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 123-130 |
Journal / Publication | Journal of Econometrics |
Volume | 169 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |
Link(s)
Abstract
We consider a multivariate version of the Diebold-Mariano test for equal predictive ability of three or more forecasting models. The Wald-type test, S, which has a null distribution that is asymptotically chi-squared, is shown to be generally invariant with respect to the ordering of the models being compared. Finite-sample corrections for the test are also developed. Monte Carlo simulations indicate that S has reasonable size properties in large samples but tends to be oversized in moderate samples. The finite-sample correction succeeds in correcting for size, but only partially. For the size-adjusted tests, power increases with sample size, as expected. It is speculated that further finite-sample improvements can be achieved using Hotelling's T2 or bootstrap critical values. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Research Area(s)
- Diebold-Mariano test, Finite-sample correction, Forecast comparison, Multivariate tests of equal predictive ability
Citation Format(s)
Statistical tests for multiple forecast comparison. / Mariano, Roberto S.; Preve, Daniel.
In: Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 169, No. 1, 07.2012, p. 123-130.Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review