Terrorist Attacks, Managerial Sentiment, and Corporate Disclosures

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

View graph of relations

Related Research Unit(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165–190
Journal / PublicationThe Accounting Review
Volume96
Issue number3
Online published2 Jul 2020
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of managerial sentiment on corporate disclosure decisions. Using terrorist attacks in the United States as adverse shocks to managerial sentiment, we find that firms located in the metropolitan areas attacked issue more negatively biased earnings forecasts. The effect is stronger for firms with higher operating uncertainty and firms with younger, inexperienced, or less confident executives and it is weaker for firms located in states with increasing violent crime rates. A potential alternative explanation is that managers strategically bias earnings forecasts downward and attribute the poor performance to terrorist attacks. To address this issue, we conduct a battery of additional analyses and find results more consistent with managerial sentiment than strategic attribution. In addition, we show that our results are unlikely to be driven by any economic effects of terrorist attacks. Finally, firms in attacked areas exhibit a more pessimistic tone in 10-K/10-Q filings.

Research Area(s)

  • Behavioral bias, Disclosure, Management forecast, Sentiment, Terrorist attacks

Bibliographic Note

Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.