“Wide-and-Open” versus “Narrow-and-Deep” group support : Which approach is better?

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › Not applicable › peer-review

1 Scopus Citations
Scopus Metrics
View graph of relations

Author(s)

Related Research Unit(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-111
Journal / PublicationGroup Decision and Negotiation
Volume6
Issue number1
Early online date15 Jan 1997
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1997

Link(s)

DOI

DOI
Check@CityULib
Link to Scopus https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33749085685&origin=recordpage
Permanent Link https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/publication(2f3f5ca8-42a5-4231-9139-89ac98c4e7f5).html

Research Area(s)

  • Group Support, Creative Idea, Bread Quality, Group Support System, Prove Track Record

Citation Format(s)

[ RIS ] [ BibTeX ]

“Wide-and-Open” versus “Narrow-and-Deep” group support : Which approach is better? / WAGNER, Christian; VOGEL, Doug; EDEN, Colin.

In: Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.1997, p. 109-111.

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › Not applicable › peer-review