Abstract
Argues that from the 1980s onwards, the Hong Kong Government has initiated a series of reforms within the civil service which eventually have been subsumed within a programme of public sector reform. The key features of these reforms are not dissimilar from the style of reform espoused within "new public management" (NPM) ideology. Argues that, despite attempts to adopt NPM ideology with regard to public sector reform, Hong Kong's reforms do not share the same institutional reform logic as those of NPM. Suggests a political discourse of NPM-based public sector reform which places the relegitimation of bureaucratic power as the key to understanding the reform process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 37-50 |
| Journal | International Journal of Public Sector Management |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 5-6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1996 |
Bibliographical note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].Research Keywords
- Hong Kong
- Managerial power
- Public administration
- Public sector
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Public sector reform and the re-legitimation of public bureaucratic power: The case of Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver