Psychometric comparison of Chinese and English versions of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire with bilingual Hong Kong Chinese students

Ashley N. Hutchison*, Dannii Y. Yeung, Lawrence H. Gerstein, Kara B. Wettersten

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ; Gross & John, 2003) assesses two emotion regulation (ER) strategies:cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Researchers have used the ERQ in cross-national studies, such as with participants in Hong Kong. There is inconsistency in psychometric equivalence data for the ERQ in Chinese among adults, and prior research in Hong Kong contradicted the ERQ’s original factor structure (Matsumoto et al., 2008).  The present study examined the factor structure, reliability and validity of a translated Traditional Chinese-ERQ and the English-ERQ with Hong Kong college students. Results revealed that both versions replicated the original two-factor structure of the ERQ (Gross & John, 2003). Evidence of the measure’s convergent, discriminant and predictive validity was obtained as well. Implications for cross-cultural scale validation particularly with Hong Kong Chinese students are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)296-303
JournalInternational Journal of Psychology
Volume56
Issue number2
Online published23 Jul 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

Research Keywords

  • Emotion regulation
  • Hong Kong
  • Measurement invariance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychometric comparison of Chinese and English versions of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire with bilingual Hong Kong Chinese students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this