Prophylactic and metaphylactic antimicrobial use in Belgian fattening pig herds

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

192 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

  • Bénédicte Callens
  • Davy Persoons
  • Dominiek Maes
  • Maria Laanen
  • Merel Postma
  • Filip Boyen
  • Freddy Haesebrouck
  • Boudewijn Catry
  • Jeroen Dewulf

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-62
Journal / PublicationPreventive Veterinary Medicine
Volume106
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2012
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

The monitoring of antimicrobial use is an essential step to control the selection and spread of antimicrobial resistance. Between January and October 2010 data on prophylactic and metaphylactic antimicrobial use were collected retrospectively on 50 closed or semi-closed pig herds. Ninety-three percent of the group treatments were prophylactic whereas only 7% were methaphylactic. The most frequently used antimicrobials orally applied at group level were colistin (30.7%), amoxicillin (30.0%), trimethoprim-sulfonamides (13.1%), doxycycline (9.9%) and tylosin (8.1%). The most frequently applied injectable antimicrobials were tulathromycin (45.0%), long acting ceftiofur (40.1%) and long acting amoxicillin (8.4%). The treatment incidences (TI) based on the used daily dose pig (UDD pig or the actually administered dose per day per kg pig of a drug) for all oral and injectable antimicrobial drugs was on average 200.7 per 1000 pigs at risk per day (min=0, max=699.0), while the TI based on the animal daily dose pig (ADD pig or the national defined average maintenance dose per day per kg pig of a drug used for its main indication) was slightly higher (average=235.8, min=0, max=1322.1). This indicates that in reality fewer pigs were treated with the same amount of antimicrobials than theoretically possible. Injectable products were generally overdosed (79.5%), whereas oral treatments were often underdosed (47.3%). In conclusion, this study shows that prophylactic group treatment was applied in 98% of the visited herds and often includes the use of critically important and broad-spectrum antimicrobials. In Belgium, the guidelines for prudent use of antimicrobials are not yet implemented. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.

Research Area(s)

  • Antimicrobial drug consumption, Group treatment, Swine

Bibliographic Note

Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

Citation Format(s)

Prophylactic and metaphylactic antimicrobial use in Belgian fattening pig herds. / Callens, Bénédicte; Persoons, Davy; Maes, Dominiek et al.
In: Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 106, No. 1, 01.09.2012, p. 53-62.

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review