Price and capacity decisions of service systems with boundedly rational customers
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 437-452 |
Journal / Publication | Naval Research Logistics |
Volume | 64 |
Issue number | 6 |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
Link(s)
Abstract
We consider price and capacity decisions for a profit-maximizing service provider in a single server queueing system, in which customers are boundedly rational and decide whether to join the service according to a multinomial logit model. We find two potential price-capacity pair solutions for the first-order condition of the profit-maximizing problem. Profit is maximized at the solution with a larger capacity, but minimized at the smaller one. We then consider a dynamically adjusting capacity system to mimic a real-life situation and find that the maximum can be reached only when the initial service rate is larger than a certain threshold; otherwise, the system capacity and demand shrink to zero. We also find that a higher level of customers’ bounded rationality does not necessarily benefit a firm, nor does it necessarily allow service to be sustained. We extend our analysis to a setting in which customers’ bounded rationality level is related to historical demand and find that such a setting makes service easier to sustain. Finally we find that bounded rationality always harms social welfare. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Research Area(s)
- bounded rationality, queueing strategy, service sustainability
Citation Format(s)
Price and capacity decisions of service systems with boundedly rational customers. / Li, Xin; Guo, Pengfei; Lian, Zhaotong.
In: Naval Research Logistics, Vol. 64, No. 6, 09.2017, p. 437-452.
In: Naval Research Logistics, Vol. 64, No. 6, 09.2017, p. 437-452.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review