Abstract
Difference and equivalence of two approaches for countercurrent chromatographic separation process were discussed. Although the two approaches are different in the TCC process in terms of model equations and definition of phase concentrations and flow rate ratios as well as complete separation regions expressed by flow rate ratios etc., they are equivalent in the SMB process. Experimental and simulation results are consistent with theoretical analysis. In application of the SMB process, it is of crucial importance to use these two approaches consistently. © Springer 2007.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 121-126 |
| Journal | Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].Research Keywords
- Microporous particles
- Separation
- Simulated Moving Bed (SMB) chromatography
- True Counter-Current (TCC) hromatography
- Zone flow rate ratios
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pore diffusion and solid diffusion models: Application in countercurrent chromatographic separation process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver