Political Theory and Classical Confucianism: A Reply to Wang, Back, Tiwald, and Ames

Sungmoon Kim

doi:10.1353/pew.2022.0029

Political Theory and Classical Confucianism: A Reply to Wang, Back, Tiwald, and Ames

Sungmoon Kim^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Center for East Asian and Comparative Philosophy

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	527-537
Journal	Philosophy East and West
Volume	72
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2022.0029
Publication status	Published - Apr 2022

Bibliographical note

Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.

Access Output

10.1353/pew.2022.0029

Other Access Options

Check CityUHK Library

Permanent Link

Right click to copy link

Cite this

@article{fdf5aab71c874e90ad98b6ab55fd10a2,

title = "Political Theory and Classical Confucianism: A Reply to Wang, Back, Tiwald, and Ames",

author = "Sungmoon Kim",

note = "Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.",

year = "2022",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1353/pew.2022.0029",

language = "English",

volume = "72",

pages = "527--537",

journal = "Philosophy East and West",

issn = "0031-8221",

publisher = "University of Hawaiʻi Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political Theory and Classical Confucianism

T2 - A Reply to Wang, Back, Tiwald, and Ames

AU - Kim, Sungmoon

N1 - Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.

PY - 2022/4

Y1 - 2022/4

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135386928&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85135386928&origin=recordpage

U2 - 10.1353/pew.2022.0029

DO - 10.1353/pew.2022.0029

M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal

SN - 0031-8221

VL - 72

SP - 527

EP - 537

JO - Philosophy East and West

JF - Philosophy East and West

IS - 2

ER -

Political Theory and Classical Confucianism: A Reply to Wang, Back, Tiwald, and Ames

Bibliographical note

Access Output

Other Access Options

Permanent Link

Other Files and Links

Cite this