Abstract
Confucian meritocratic rule has been recently advocated on the basis of the economic performance of Western democracies and the political ignorance of their average voters. These arguments are grounded in the analyses of real phenomena, but they are insufficient to establish the greater effectiveness of political meritocracy over democracy. This does not mean that the principle of political meritocracy (a principle of government that aims to strengthen the role of the competent and the morally good ones) is irrelevant to the solution of some of the troubles affecting contemporary democracies. On the contrary, such a principle could play a significant role in designing auxiliary institutional mechanisms to strengthen the quality of political leadership in a democracy. © The Author(s) 2020.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1127-1145 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Philosophy and Social Criticism |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Online published | 17 Aug 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Research Keywords
- Confucian political meritocracy
- morally virtuous leaders
- political parties
- Singapore
- Western democracies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Political meritocracy and the troubles of Western democracies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver