Abstract
We investigate how local political corruption shapes corporate financial reporting conservatism. Using a large sample of U.S. public firms, we find that firms located in areas with higher levels of political corruption tend to adopt greater accounting conservatism. We also find that firms in more corrupt areas bear greater political expropriation costs. Further analysis reveals that the positive effect of corruption on conservatism is stronger for firms with less bargaining power against corrupt officials, firms with lower public visibility, and firms with weaker dependence on the government for sales. Overall, our findings support the expropriation hypothesis that corrupt officials have incentives to expropriate resources from local firms, which induces them to adopt more conservative reporting strategies to shield their assets. © 2023 European Accounting Association.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 279–305 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | European Accounting Review |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Online published | 8 Aug 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Research Keywords
- Accounting Conservatism
- Expropriation cost
- Political corruption
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Political Corruption and Accounting Conservatism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver