Abstract
This article assesses the practice of political accountability in Hong Kong: whether it has largely been realised in practice, or whether it is merely a political slogan for the government to justify its executive-led governance. The analysis begins with a review of the theoretical concepts of political accountability and ministerial accountability, and then establishes an operational framework to analyse the current practice of political accountability in Hong Kong's political system. It concludes by addressing the degree of political accountability overall. © 2009 National Council of the Institute of Public Administration Australia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Australian Journal of Public Administration |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue number | SUPPL. 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Research Keywords
- Hong Kong
- Ministerial accountability
- Political accountability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Political accountability in Hong Kong: Myth or reality?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver