Abstract
Background: Functional connectivity between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and subgenual cingulate (sgACC) may serve as a biomarker for transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment response. The first aim was to establish whether this finding is veridical or artifactually induced by the pre-processing method. Furthermore, alternative biomarkers were identified and the clinical utility for personalized medicine was examined.
Methods: Resting-state fMRI data were collected in medication-refractory depressed patients (n = 70, 16 males) before undergoing neuronavigated left DLPFC rTMS. Seed-based analyses were performed with and without global signal regression pre-processing to identify biomarkers of short-term and long-term treatment response. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve and supervised machine learning analyses were applied to assess the clinical utility of these biomarkers for the classification of categorical rTMS response.
Results: Regardless of the pre-processing method, DLPFC-sgACC connectivity was not associated with treatment outcome. Instead, poorer connectivity between the sgACC and three clusters (peak locations: frontal pole, superior parietal lobule, occipital cortex) and DLPFC-central opercular cortex were observed in long-term nonresponders. The identified connections could serve as acceptable to excellent markers. Combining the features using supervised machine learning reached accuracy rates of 95.35% (CI=82.94–100.00) and 88.89% (CI=63.96–100.00) in the cross-validation and test dataset, respectively.
Limitations: The sample size was moderate, and features for machine learning were based on group differences.
Conclusions: Long-term nonresponders showed greater disrupted connectivity in regions involving the central executive network. Our findings may aid the development of personalized medicine for medication-refractory depression.
Methods: Resting-state fMRI data were collected in medication-refractory depressed patients (n = 70, 16 males) before undergoing neuronavigated left DLPFC rTMS. Seed-based analyses were performed with and without global signal regression pre-processing to identify biomarkers of short-term and long-term treatment response. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve and supervised machine learning analyses were applied to assess the clinical utility of these biomarkers for the classification of categorical rTMS response.
Results: Regardless of the pre-processing method, DLPFC-sgACC connectivity was not associated with treatment outcome. Instead, poorer connectivity between the sgACC and three clusters (peak locations: frontal pole, superior parietal lobule, occipital cortex) and DLPFC-central opercular cortex were observed in long-term nonresponders. The identified connections could serve as acceptable to excellent markers. Combining the features using supervised machine learning reached accuracy rates of 95.35% (CI=82.94–100.00) and 88.89% (CI=63.96–100.00) in the cross-validation and test dataset, respectively.
Limitations: The sample size was moderate, and features for machine learning were based on group differences.
Conclusions: Long-term nonresponders showed greater disrupted connectivity in regions involving the central executive network. Our findings may aid the development of personalized medicine for medication-refractory depression.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 261-271 |
| Journal | Journal of Affective Disorders |
| Volume | 290 |
| Online published | 16 May 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2021 |
Research Keywords
- Biomarkers
- Depression
- Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
- Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation
- Treatment response
RGC Funding Information
- RGC-funded
Policy Impact
- Cited in Policy Documents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Personalized prediction of transcranial magnetic stimulation clinical response in patients with treatment-refractory depression using neuroimaging biomarkers and machine learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver