Performativity or Discourse? An Interview with John Searle
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 135-147 |
Journal / Publication | Theory, Culture & Society |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - May 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
Link(s)
Abstract
Scott Lash interviews John Searle, one of the foremost contemporary philosophers. Over the course of the conversation, Searle discusses his research into performativity, language and intentionality, the question of information and his account of social ontology. The conversation initially deals with the early influence of John Austin and Ludwig Wittgenstein as well as Searle's relationship to phenomenology and the rest of the philosophical tradition. This offers a conceptual reconstruction of Searle's work from multiple perspectives. Crucial concepts are highlighted such as performativity, speech acts, intentionality and natural language. The discussion also touches on Searle's recent debates around the questions of information and consciousness. The conversation ends with an overview of Searle's social ontology, his theory of institutions and his relationship with post-structuralism. © 2015, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.
Research Area(s)
- information, intentionality, language, performativity, speech acts, Wittgenstein
Bibliographic Note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].
Citation Format(s)
Performativity or Discourse? An Interview with John Searle. / Lash, Scott.
In: Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 32, No. 3, 05.2015, p. 135-147.
In: Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 32, No. 3, 05.2015, p. 135-147.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review