Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Performance evaluation of CROWNs: WDM multi-ring topologies

Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary WorksRGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (with host publication)peer-review

Abstract

It is well known that the maximum node throughput achievable in a single channel ring network is inversely proportional to the number of connected nodes. Furthermore, in an optical medium network, the electronics required to elaborate in-transit data at each node creates a performance bottleneck for the whole communication system. Recent progress in WDM techniques has opened the possibility to overcome these problems by relying on a multi-channel, optical, solution. This work presents and analyzes an approach to obtaining a Concurrently accessed multi-Ring all-Optical WDM Network (CROWN) with a node architecture in which in-transit packets pass through the node without being converted into the electronic domain. Using a single high speed transmitter and receiver per node, CROWN allows data to be maintained in the optical format while resolving receiver contentions. An original modeling technique, with an effective characterization of the principal aspects of the system behavior, is also provided for performance evaluation, showing that network capacity and network latency are improved under the proposed solution. © 1995 IEEE
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings IEEE International Conference on Communications ICC '95
PublisherIEEE
Pages1296-1301
Volume2
ISBN (Print)0-7803-2486-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1995
Event1995 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '95) - Seattle, WA, United States
Duration: 18 Jun 199522 Jun 1995

Conference

Conference1995 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '95)
PlaceUnited States
CitySeattle, WA
Period18/06/9522/06/95

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance evaluation of CROWNs: WDM multi-ring topologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this