Abstract
Taking the perspective of others is critical for both human–human and human–robot interactions. Previous studies using the dot perspective task have revealed that people could automatically process what other people can see. In this study, following the classical dot perspective task, we showed that Chinese participants could not automatically process humanoid robot avatars’ perspective when only judging from self-perspective (Experiment 1) or randomly judging between self and avatar’s perspectives (Experiment 2), and people’s anthropomorphism tendency was related to the efficiency but not the automaticity of perspective-taking. These results revealed that human–human and human–robot interactions might be different in the basic visual process, and suggested the anthropomorphism tendency in people as an influential factor in human–robot interaction.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 165-176 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | International Journal of Social Robotics |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Online published | 31 Mar 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Funding
This study was funded by the Major Projects of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Jiangsu Universities (Grant Number 2018SJZDA020), and the Fourth Pilot-research Program for Human Spaceflight of China (Grant Number 030602).
Research Keywords
- Anthropomorphism
- Human–robot interaction
- Individual differences
- Visual perspective‐taking