Patent Litigation and Narrative R&D Disclosures: Evidence from the Adoption of Anti-Troll Legislation

Rui Huang, Jeong-Bon Kim, Louise Yi Lu, Dongyue Wang, Yangxin Yu

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The last two decades have witnessed a sharp increase in patent litigation in the United States (U.S.), mainly driven by patent trolls. By exploiting the staggered adoption of Anti-Troll laws across 34 states as a plausible exogenous shock that reduces the risk of patent litigation by these trolls, we show that firms significantly increase their narrative R&D disclosures following the enactment of Anti-Troll laws. This effect is less pronounced in firms facing higher competitive pressure, and more pronounced in firms that are more exposed to threats from patent trolls. Further analyses alleviate the concern that the impact of Anti-Troll laws on disclosures is attributable to state-level economic or policy changes. Our results highlight the significant role of patent troll litigation in influencing the dissemination of narrative R&D information. © 2024 Elsevier B.V.
Original languageEnglish
Article number105127
Number of pages15
JournalResearch Policy
Volume54
Issue number1
Online published27 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Full text of this publication does not contain sufficient affiliation information. With consent from the author(s) concerned, the Research Unit(s) information for this record is based on the existing academic department affiliation of the author(s)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patent Litigation and Narrative R&D Disclosures: Evidence from the Adoption of Anti-Troll Legislation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this