Partisan Bias of Perceived Incivility and its Political Consequences : Evidence from Survey Experiments in Hong Kong

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

21 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)357-379
Journal / PublicationJournal of Communication
Volume71
Issue number3
Online published21 Jun 2021
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Exposure to presumably uncivil content is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for perceptions of incivility and thus could lead to differential political consequences. To examine the emergence and consequences of perceived incivility in disagreement comments, the present study reports on two population-based online survey experiments in Hong Kong (N1 = 1,207, N2 = 611). The results indicate that individuals perceive a higher degree of incivility in disagreement comments directed to in-group members than in those directed to out-group members, regardless of content features. This bias perception is greater when respondents can easily identify the incivility in a comment. Furthermore, exposure to disagreement comments can only influence willingness to participate and affective polarization indirectly via perceived incivility, and such effects are conditional on whether respondents can easily identify the incivility in a comment. © 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Communication Association. All rights reserved.

Research Area(s)

  • Affective Polarization, Incivility, Perception Bias, Political Disagreement, Survey Experiment