Partisan Bias of Perceived Incivility and its Political Consequences: Evidence from Survey Experiments in Hong Kong

Hai Liang*, Xinzhi Zhang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Exposure to presumably uncivil content is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for perceptions of incivility and thus could lead to differential political consequences. To examine the emergence and consequences of perceived incivility in disagreement comments, the present study reports on two population-based online survey experiments in Hong Kong (N1 = 1,207, N2 = 611). The results indicate that individuals perceive a higher degree of incivility in disagreement comments directed to in-group members than in those directed to out-group members, regardless of content features. This bias perception is greater when respondents can easily identify the incivility in a comment. Furthermore, exposure to disagreement comments can only influence willingness to participate and affective polarization indirectly via perceived incivility, and such effects are conditional on whether respondents can easily identify the incivility in a comment. © 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Communication Association. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)357-379
JournalJournal of Communication
Volume71
Issue number3
Online published21 Jun 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021
Externally publishedYes

Research Keywords

  • Affective Polarization
  • Incivility
  • Perception Bias
  • Political Disagreement
  • Survey Experiment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Partisan Bias of Perceived Incivility and its Political Consequences: Evidence from Survey Experiments in Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this