Pareto Optimization for Active Learning under Out-of-Distribution Data Scenarios

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

2 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

  • Zeyu Dai (Co-first Author)
  • Qing Li
  • Haoyi Xiong
  • Dejing Dou

Related Research Unit(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages33
Journal / PublicationTransactions on Machine Learning Research
Volume2023
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2023

Link(s)

Abstract

Pool-based Active Learning (AL) has proven successful in minimizing labeling costs by sequentially selecting the most informative unlabeled data from large pool and querying their labels from an oracle or annotators. However, existing AL sampling schemes may not perform well in out-of-distribution (OOD) data scenarios, where the unlabeled data pool contains samples that do not belong to the pre-defined categories of the target task. Achieving strong AL performance under OOD data scenarios presents a challenge due to the inherent conflict between AL sampling strategies and OOD data detection. For instance, both more informative in-distribution (ID) data and OOD data in an unlabeled data pool would be assigned high informativeness scores (e.g., high entropy) during AL processes. To address this dilemma, we propose a Monte-Carlo Pareto Optimization for Active Learning (POAL) sampling scheme, which selects optimal subsets of unlabeled samples with fixed batch size from the unlabeled data pool. We formulate the AL sampling task as a multi-objective optimization problem and employ Pareto optimization based on two conflicting objectives: (1) the conventional AL sampling scheme (e.g., maximum entropy) and (2) the confidence of excluding OOD data samples. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our POAL approach on classical Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) tasks. © 2023, Transactions on Machine Learning Research. All rights reserved.

Research Area(s)

Bibliographic Note

Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.

Download Statistics

No data available