Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ownership Structure, Institutional Development, and Political Extraction: Evidence from China

Research output: Conference PapersRGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (without host publication)peer-review

Abstract

This paper examines how ownership structure and institutional development influence the liquidity management and investment policies of firms, in response to the threat of political extraction in China. First, we document evidence that firms controlled by private entrepreneurs hold less cash reserves than their state-owned counterparts. In addition, cash holdings (investments) is positively (negatively) related to the strength of economic institutions. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that managers of private firms and firms located in provinces with weaker institutions have incentives to protect their assets from being expropriated by politicians, through holding less cash (which are easier to extract) and pursuing more investments in fixed assets (which are harder to extract). Finally, we find that firms with close connections to politicians hoard cash reserves and display lower investments than their non-connected counterparts. This suggests that political connections mitigate the threat of political extraction for those connected firms.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 17 Dec 2010
Event18th SFM Conference - Kaohsiung, Taiwan, China
Duration: 17 Dec 201018 Dec 2010

Conference

Conference18th SFM Conference
PlaceTaiwan, China
CityKaohsiung
Period17/12/1018/12/10

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ownership Structure, Institutional Development, and Political Extraction: Evidence from China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this