TY - JOUR
T1 - Online content platforms, copyright decision-making algorithms and fundamental rights protection in China
AU - He, Tianxiang
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Concentration of power in terms of user traffic and copyright content is most evident in content platforms in China. The concentration has generated an unexpected impact on the way we understand and appreciate creativity, the copyright enforcement and determination of liability on content platforms, and the regulation of the cultural market by the government. Specifically, the concentration of power in content platforms has not only curbed direct online piracies to a large extent but has also accelerated the fragmentation of copyright enforcement and spawned the need for algorithmic recommendation and filtering systems, which in turn has reinforced the cultural censorship system of China. This paper argues that the employment of algorithms by platforms in screening uploads and making recommendations must be treated with prudence: the algorithmic decision-making systems employed by platforms must be transparent as much as possible, and remedies must be provided for concerned users. The algorithms employed by content platforms must be adjusted to reflect not just the interests of the platforms but also the public interest in accessing and delivering information and local policy considerations. This paper suggests that our regulative framework should reflect the algorithmic turn of content platforms in its legal and non-legal instruments and alleviate their negative impact on society.
AB - Concentration of power in terms of user traffic and copyright content is most evident in content platforms in China. The concentration has generated an unexpected impact on the way we understand and appreciate creativity, the copyright enforcement and determination of liability on content platforms, and the regulation of the cultural market by the government. Specifically, the concentration of power in content platforms has not only curbed direct online piracies to a large extent but has also accelerated the fragmentation of copyright enforcement and spawned the need for algorithmic recommendation and filtering systems, which in turn has reinforced the cultural censorship system of China. This paper argues that the employment of algorithms by platforms in screening uploads and making recommendations must be treated with prudence: the algorithmic decision-making systems employed by platforms must be transparent as much as possible, and remedies must be provided for concerned users. The algorithms employed by content platforms must be adjusted to reflect not just the interests of the platforms but also the public interest in accessing and delivering information and local policy considerations. This paper suggests that our regulative framework should reflect the algorithmic turn of content platforms in its legal and non-legal instruments and alleviate their negative impact on society.
KW - Concentration of power
KW - copyright
KW - algorithmic decision making
KW - content platforms
KW - freedom of speech
KW - information cocoon
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126264973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85126264973&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1080/17579961.2022.2047519
DO - 10.1080/17579961.2022.2047519
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 1757-9961
VL - 14
SP - 71
EP - 94
JO - Law, Innovation and Technology
JF - Law, Innovation and Technology
IS - 1
ER -