On the validity of microscopic calculations of double-quantum-dot spin qubits based on Fock-Darwin states
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 040313 |
Journal / Publication | Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 4 |
Online published | 25 Jan 2018 |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2018 |
Link(s)
Abstract
We consider two typical approximations that are used in the microscopic calculations of double-quantum dot spin qubits, namely, the Heitler-London (HL) and the Hund-Mulliken (HM) approximations, which use linear combinations of Fock-Darwin states to approximate the two-electron states under the double-well confinement potential. We compared these results to a case in which the solution to a one-dimensional Schrödinger equation was exactly known and found that typical microscopic calculations based on Fock-Darwin states substantially underestimate the value of the exchange interaction, which is the key parameter that controls the quantum dot spin qubits. This underestimation originates from the lack of tunneling of Fock-Darwin states, which is accurate only in the case with a single potential well. Our results suggest that the accuracies of the current two-dimensional molecular- orbit-theoretical calculations based on Fock-Darwin states should be revisited since underestimation could only deteriorate in dimensions that are higher than one.
Research Area(s)
- double quantum dots, exchange interaction, spin qubits
Citation Format(s)
On the validity of microscopic calculations of double-quantum-dot spin qubits based on Fock-Darwin states. / Chan, GuoXuan; Wang, Xin.
In: Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, Vol. 61, No. 4, 040313, 04.2018.
In: Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, Vol. 61, No. 4, 040313, 04.2018.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review