On the sensitivity of the restricted least squares estimators to covariance misspecification

Alan T.K. Wan, Guohua Zou, Huaizhen Qin

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Traditional econometrics has long stressed the serious consequences of non-spherical disturbances for the estimation and testing procedures under the spherical disturbance setting, that is, the procedures become invalid and can give rise to misleading results. In practice, it is not unusual, however, to find that the parameter estimates do not change much after fitting the more general structure. This suggests that the usual procedures may well be robust to covariance misspecification. Banerjee and Magnus (1999) proposed sensitivity statistics to decide if the Ordinary Least Squares estimators of the coefficients and the disturbance variance are sensitive to deviations from the spherical error assumption. This paper extends their work by investigating the sensitivity of the restricted least squares estimator to covariance misspecification where the restrictions may or may not be correct. Large sample results giving analytical evidence to some of the numerical findings reported in Banerjee and Magnus (1999) are also obtained. © Royal Economic Society 2007.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)471-487
    JournalEconometrics Journal
    Volume10
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2007

    Research Keywords

    • Autocorrelation
    • Non-spherical disturbances
    • Restrictions
    • Sensitivity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On the sensitivity of the restricted least squares estimators to covariance misspecification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this