Abstract
In 2003, the Housing Department launched a marking scheme which aimed to improve environmental hygiene in public housing estates in Hong Kong. Although the scheme can potentially stop anti-social behaviour and other misconduct in public housing estates, the choice of public housing tenants as the sole target of control has not been clearly explained. Therefore, this study attempts to justify this administration-driven marking scheme. It appears that welfare conditionality cannot fully justify the scheme because public housing tenants are not the only recipients of housing welfare in Hong Kong. In addition, discriminating between public housing tenants and the most deprived is not defensible. More importantly, not all the offences prescribed in the marking scheme are socially undesirable. However, the substance of the scheme seems to match the ideologies of Chinese legalism quite well, and the scheme appears to be an initiative by the Hong Kong Housing Authority to strengthen its sovereignty over public housing resources in the city. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 701-722 |
| Journal | Housing Studies |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Research Keywords
- Anti-social behaviour
- Chinese legalism
- Policy opportunism
- Social housing
- Welfare conditionality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the anti-social behaviour control in Hong Kong's public Housing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver