Abstract
Although electron-doped superconductivity is readily achieved in Ln2-xCexCuO4 for Ln = (La, Nd), Pr, Nd, Sm, and Eu, the Ln=Gd member remains to be a notable exception in the series. Whether or not the weak ferromagnetism observed in Gd2-xCexCuO4 is responsible for the suppression of superconductivity needs to be clarified. A systematic investigation of the Ln2-xCexCuO4 phases reveal that the absence of superconductivity in Gd2-xCexCuO4 is due to an inability, arising from a smaller lattice parameter, to achieve (i) the required electron concentration and (ii) a uniform oxygen coordination around the Cu atoms, and not necessarily due to the weak ferromagnetism. The difficulties to achieve bulk superconductivity in (La, Gd)2-xCexCuO4 phases-which do not have weak ferromagnetism-support this assertion. © 1994.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 165-169 |
| Journal | Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications |
| Volume | 226 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 1994 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the absence of superconductivity in Ln2-xCexCuO4'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver