TY - JOUR
T1 - On maximum likelihood estimation of the differencing parameter of fractionally-integrated noise with unknown mean
AU - Cheung, Yin-Wong
AU - Diebold, Francis X.
PY - 1994/6
Y1 - 1994/6
N2 - There are two approaches to maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of the parameter of fractionally- integrated noise: approximate frequency-domain ML [Fox and Taqqu (1986)] and exact time- domain ML [Sowell (1992b)]. If the mean of the process is known, then a clear finite-sample mean-squared error ranking of the estimators emerges: the exact time-domain estimator is superior. We show in this paper, however, that the finite-sample efficiency of approximate frequency-domain ML relative to exact time-domain ML rises dramatically when the mean is unknown and so must be estimated. The intuition for our result is straightforward: the frequency-domain ML estimator is invariant to the true but unknown mean of the process, while the time-domain ML estimator is not. Feasible time-domain estimation must therefore be based upon de-meaned data, but the long memory associated with fractional integration makes precise estimation of the mean difficult. We conclude that the frequency-domain estimator is an attractive and efficient alternative for situations in which large sample sizes render time-domain estimation impractical. © 1994.
AB - There are two approaches to maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of the parameter of fractionally- integrated noise: approximate frequency-domain ML [Fox and Taqqu (1986)] and exact time- domain ML [Sowell (1992b)]. If the mean of the process is known, then a clear finite-sample mean-squared error ranking of the estimators emerges: the exact time-domain estimator is superior. We show in this paper, however, that the finite-sample efficiency of approximate frequency-domain ML relative to exact time-domain ML rises dramatically when the mean is unknown and so must be estimated. The intuition for our result is straightforward: the frequency-domain ML estimator is invariant to the true but unknown mean of the process, while the time-domain ML estimator is not. Feasible time-domain estimation must therefore be based upon de-meaned data, but the long memory associated with fractional integration makes precise estimation of the mean difficult. We conclude that the frequency-domain estimator is an attractive and efficient alternative for situations in which large sample sizes render time-domain estimation impractical. © 1994.
KW - Fractional differencing
KW - Frequency domain estimation
KW - Maximum likelihood estimation
KW - Simulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039657324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0039657324&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1016/0304-4076(94)90026-4
DO - 10.1016/0304-4076(94)90026-4
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 0304-4076
VL - 62
SP - 301
EP - 316
JO - Journal of Econometrics
JF - Journal of Econometrics
IS - 2
ER -