On assessing posterior mode shape uncertainty in ambient modal identification
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 427 - 434 |
Journal / Publication | Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Link(s)
Abstract
Ambient vibration test has gained increasing popularity in practice as it provides an economical means for identifying the actual modal properties of a structure in its working state without the need for artificial loading. Since the signal-to-noise ratio cannot be directly controlled, the uncertainty associated with the identified modal parameters is often a primary concern. In a Bayesian context the posterior most probable value of the mode shape (given the measured data) is the point that minimizes the log-likelihood function; the posterior covariance matrix is equal to the inverse of the Hessian evaluated at the most probable value. This article discusses two technical issues associated with assessing the posterior uncertainty of mode shape. We discuss how to impose Euclidean norm constraint on mode shapes when calculating the Hessian of the log-likelihood function. Second, we investigate the Modal Assurance Criteria (MAC) of the most probable mode shape with a random mode shape consistent with the posterior distribution. The expectation of this MAC is found to provide a global measure of the posterior uncertainty. Ambient modal identification of a footbridge and a super tall building are used to illustrate the theoretical findings.
Research Area(s)
- Bayesian method, modal test, modal assurance criterion, mode shape
Citation Format(s)
On assessing posterior mode shape uncertainty in ambient modal identification. / AU, Siu Kui; ZHANG, Feng Liang.
In: Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2011, p. 427 - 434.
In: Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2011, p. 427 - 434.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review