TY - CHAP
T1 - Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment (NSA) Tools
T2 - A Systematic Review on How to Choose the Best Analysis Tool
AU - Chimanski, Roberto T.
AU - Corrêa Maceno, Marcell Mariano
AU - Chopra, Shauhrat S.
N1 - This has also been published in: Chimanski, R. T., Maceno, M. M. C., & Chopra, S. S. (2022). Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment (NSA) Tools: A Systematic Review on How to Choose the Best Analysis Tool. In W. L. Filho, A. M. Azul, F. Doni, & A. L. Salvia (Eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future: Policies, Technologies and Education by 2050 Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_93-1
Full text of this publication does not contain sufficient affiliation information. With consent from the author(s) concerned, the Research Unit(s) information for this record is based on the existing academic department affiliation of the author(s).
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This study has the objective of a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to contemplate the following actions: to identify noncommercial NSA tool alternatives to be used by municipalities in urban planning and revitalization, to identify the NSA tools developed in recent years, identify criteria considered for neighborhood sustainability assessment, and critically analyze the tools found. The SLR was performed using three databases, limiting searches between 2017 and 2021, considering only published scientific articles. The selected papers met the requirements of presenting NSA tools or models with instructions for use, being composed of mathematical indicators, and finally presenting the analysis results already synthesized. After an initial search, 25 tools were found, of which 5 tools were selected according to the search criteria and objectives. The topics covered in the selected tools include the analysis of neighborhoods and cities through a list of indicators based on the literature and government guidelines. The comparison results show that although they have been developed in different countries, a pattern is observed in the analysis structure with the similarity of indicators that are mutually applied in the analyzed tools. The method of displaying the results of the tools is a significant differential, which can be expressed in terms of graphic scale, decision-making matrix, or mapping the performance of the areas. The biggest challenge observed in the use of the tools is the availability of required data. The main points to be taken into account when choosing a tool are the availability of local data, what are the theoretical basis of the tool, the possibility of adaptability of the indicators, and the format of the results delivered. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023.
AB - This study has the objective of a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to contemplate the following actions: to identify noncommercial NSA tool alternatives to be used by municipalities in urban planning and revitalization, to identify the NSA tools developed in recent years, identify criteria considered for neighborhood sustainability assessment, and critically analyze the tools found. The SLR was performed using three databases, limiting searches between 2017 and 2021, considering only published scientific articles. The selected papers met the requirements of presenting NSA tools or models with instructions for use, being composed of mathematical indicators, and finally presenting the analysis results already synthesized. After an initial search, 25 tools were found, of which 5 tools were selected according to the search criteria and objectives. The topics covered in the selected tools include the analysis of neighborhoods and cities through a list of indicators based on the literature and government guidelines. The comparison results show that although they have been developed in different countries, a pattern is observed in the analysis structure with the similarity of indicators that are mutually applied in the analyzed tools. The method of displaying the results of the tools is a significant differential, which can be expressed in terms of graphic scale, decision-making matrix, or mapping the performance of the areas. The biggest challenge observed in the use of the tools is the availability of required data. The main points to be taken into account when choosing a tool are the availability of local data, what are the theoretical basis of the tool, the possibility of adaptability of the indicators, and the format of the results delivered. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023.
KW - Neighborhood sustainability assessment
KW - Systematic review
KW - Tools
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204537055&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85204537055&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-04560-8_93
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-04560-8_93
M3 - RGC 12 - Chapter in an edited book (Author)
SN - 9783031045592
SP - 1637
EP - 1659
BT - Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future
A2 - Filho, Walter Leal
A2 - Azul, Anabela Marisa
A2 - Doni, Federica
A2 - Salvia, Amanda Lange
PB - Springer
CY - Cham
ER -