Abstract
Motivated by the contradictory findings in literature regarding whether high-reputation sellers enjoy a price premium over low-reputation sellers, this paper examines the pricing strategies of sellers with different reputation levels. We find that a negative price premium effect (i.e., a high-reputation seller charges a lower price than a low-reputation seller) exists due to: (1) the presence of both informed and uninformed buyers, which makes sellers follow mixed pricing strategies. It is then possible for a high-reputation seller setting a lower price than a low-reputation seller. Moreover, when the proportion of informed buyers exceeds a certain threshold, the expected price of a high-reputation seller is even lower than that of a low-reputation seller; (2) the competition among the sellers, which reduces the high-reputation sellers' prices but increases the low-reputation sellers' prices. Consequently, a high-reputation seller is more likely to charge a lower price than a low-reputation seller when the competition intensifies. Our empirical findings also support our theoretical results on the negative price premium effect. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 681-690 |
| Journal | Decision Support Systems |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2012 |
Research Keywords
- Buyer informativeness
- Competition
- Negative price premium effect
- Pricing strategy
- Seller reputation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Negative price premium effect in online market - The impact of competition and buyer informativeness on the pricing strategies of sellers with different reputation levels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver