Abstract
Objective: The current study aims to assess, for the first time, whether vaccination is predicted by different behavioral and cognitive aspects of moral decision-making.
Background: Studies linking moral factors to vaccination have largely examined whether vaccination decisions can be explained by individual differences in the endorsement of various principles and norms central to deontology-based arguments in vaccination ethics. However, these studies have overlooked whether individuals prioritize norms over other considerations when making decisions, such as maximizing consequences (utilitarianism).
Method: In a sample of 1492 participants, the current study assessed whether vaccination is explained by individual differences in three aspects of moral decision-making (consequence sensitivity, norm sensitivity, and action tendency), while also considering ethics position (idealism, relativism) and moral identity.
Results: Supportive vaccination (vaccine uptake accompanied by a positive attitude toward vaccines) was associated with utilitarianism (increased consequence sensitivity) and increased tolerance to risks and harm toward others. Meanwhile, although those in the non-vaccinated group was associated with higher harm sensitivities, they neither supported nor received the COVID vaccines (when vaccines prevent harm from infection).
Conclusion: Pro-vaccination messages may be made more effective by addressing perceptions of harms associated with vaccines and infections, respectively.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Personality published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Background: Studies linking moral factors to vaccination have largely examined whether vaccination decisions can be explained by individual differences in the endorsement of various principles and norms central to deontology-based arguments in vaccination ethics. However, these studies have overlooked whether individuals prioritize norms over other considerations when making decisions, such as maximizing consequences (utilitarianism).
Method: In a sample of 1492 participants, the current study assessed whether vaccination is explained by individual differences in three aspects of moral decision-making (consequence sensitivity, norm sensitivity, and action tendency), while also considering ethics position (idealism, relativism) and moral identity.
Results: Supportive vaccination (vaccine uptake accompanied by a positive attitude toward vaccines) was associated with utilitarianism (increased consequence sensitivity) and increased tolerance to risks and harm toward others. Meanwhile, although those in the non-vaccinated group was associated with higher harm sensitivities, they neither supported nor received the COVID vaccines (when vaccines prevent harm from infection).
Conclusion: Pro-vaccination messages may be made more effective by addressing perceptions of harms associated with vaccines and infections, respectively.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Personality published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 820-836 |
| Journal | Journal of Personality |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Online published | 29 Oct 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2024 |
Funding
Rongjun Yu received funding from Humanities and Social Sciences Prestigious Fellowship Scheme (32000222) from the Research Grants Council (RGC), Hong Kong.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Research Keywords
- COVID-19
- idealism
- moral
- utilitarianism
- vaccination
Publisher's Copyright Statement
- This full text is made available under CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
RGC Funding Information
- RGC-funded
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Moral characteristics predicting COVID-19 vaccination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver