Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Models of language production and the temporal organization of lexical access

Niels O. Schiller, F.-Xavier Alario

Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary WorksRGC 12 - Chapter in an edited book (Author)peer-review

Abstract

This chapter focusses on models of language production and the temporal organization of the processes involved in lexical access. Albert Costa contributed significantly to advancing our understanding of lexical access. Through the investigation of multilingual speakers, he added an important dimension to this discussion. Here, we provide a discussion of discrete and cascaded/interactive accounts of lexical access and summarize some of the crucial experimental evidence that has been offered for and against these different theories, roughly over the years when Albert contributed to these debates. We will also discuss whether or not lexical selection is competitive and what research on multilingual speech production contributed to our knowledge on lexical access. The discussion is mainly restricted to behavioral data, with some references to electrophysiological studies. We conclude that considering the experimental evidence a strict version of discrete processing models is difficult to maintain. Research on bilingual language production has made important contributions to the discussion, however, the picture is not yet complete. © 2023 John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBilingualism through the Prism of Psycholinguistics
EditorsMikel Santesteban , Jon Andoni Duñabeitia , Cristina Baus
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
Chapter1
Pages28-53
ISBN (Electronic)9789027249609
ISBN (Print)9789027213969
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameBilingual Processing and Acquisition
Volume17
ISSN (Print)2352-0531

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Models of language production and the temporal organization of lexical access'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this