Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Minimum-Latency Aggregation Scheduling in Multihop Wireless Networks

  • Peng-Jun Wan
  • , Scott C.-H. Huang
  • , Lixin Wang
  • , Zhiyuan Wan
  • , Xiaohua Jia

Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary Works › RGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (with host publication) › peer-review

Abstract

Minimum-latency aggregation schedule (MLAS) in synchronous multihop wireless networks seeks a shortest schedule for data aggregation subject to the interference constraint. In this paper, we study MLAS under the protocol interference model in which each node has a unit communication radius and an interference radius ρ ≥ 1. All known aggregation schedules assumed ρ = 1, and the best-known aggregation latency with ρ = 1 is 23R + Δ - 18 where R and Δ are the radius and maximum degree of the communication topology respectfully. In this paper, we first construct three aggregations schedules with ρ = 1 of latency 15R + Δ - 4, 2R + O (log R) + Δ and (1 + O (log R/3√R)) R + Δ respectively. Then, we obtain two aggregation schedules with ρ > 1 by expanding the first two aggregation schedules with ρ = 1. Both aggregation schedules with ρ > 1 have latency within constant factors of the minimum aggregation latency.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMobiHoc '09 - Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing
Pages185-193
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2009
Event10th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc '09) - New Orleans, United States
Duration: 18 May 2009 → 21 May 2009

Conference

Conference10th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc '09)
PlaceUnited States
CityNew Orleans
Period18/05/09 → 21/05/09

Research Keywords

  • Aggregation
  • Approximation algorithms
  • Communication latency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Minimum-Latency Aggregation Scheduling in Multihop Wireless Networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this