TY - JOUR
T1 - Microsolvation effects on the reactivity of oxy-nucleophiles
T2 - the case of gas-phase SN2 reactions of YO−(CH3OH)n=1,2 towards CH3Cl
AU - Yun-Yun, Liu
AU - Fang-Zhou, Qiu
AU - Jun, Zhu
AU - Yi, Ren
AU - Kai-Chung, Lau
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - The modified G4(MP2) method was applied to explore microsolvation effects on the reactivity of four solvated normal oxy-nucleophiles YO−(CH3OH)n=1,2 (Y = CH3, C2H5, FC2H4, ClC2H4), and five α-oxy-nucleophiles YO−(CH3OH)n=1,2 (Y = HO, CH3O, F, Cl, Br), in gas-phase SN2 reactions towards the substrate CH3Cl. Based on a Brønsted-type plot, our calculations reveal that the overall activation barriers of five microsolvated α-oxy-nucleophiles are obviously smaller than the prediction from the correlation line constructed by four normal microsolvated ones to different degrees, and clearly demonstrate the existence of an α-effect in the presence of one or two methanol molecule(s). Moreover, it was found that the α-effect of the mono-methanol microsolvated α-nucleophile is stronger than that of the monohydrated α-nucleophile. However, the α-effect of YO−(CH3OH)2 becomes weaker for Y = HO and CH3O, whereas it becomes stronger for Y = F, Cl, Br than that of YO−(H2O)2, which can be explained by analyses of the activation strain model in the two cases. It was also found that the rationale about the low ionization energy of α-nucleophile inducing the α-effect was not widely significant. [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
AB - The modified G4(MP2) method was applied to explore microsolvation effects on the reactivity of four solvated normal oxy-nucleophiles YO−(CH3OH)n=1,2 (Y = CH3, C2H5, FC2H4, ClC2H4), and five α-oxy-nucleophiles YO−(CH3OH)n=1,2 (Y = HO, CH3O, F, Cl, Br), in gas-phase SN2 reactions towards the substrate CH3Cl. Based on a Brønsted-type plot, our calculations reveal that the overall activation barriers of five microsolvated α-oxy-nucleophiles are obviously smaller than the prediction from the correlation line constructed by four normal microsolvated ones to different degrees, and clearly demonstrate the existence of an α-effect in the presence of one or two methanol molecule(s). Moreover, it was found that the α-effect of the mono-methanol microsolvated α-nucleophile is stronger than that of the monohydrated α-nucleophile. However, the α-effect of YO−(CH3OH)2 becomes weaker for Y = HO and CH3O, whereas it becomes stronger for Y = F, Cl, Br than that of YO−(H2O)2, which can be explained by analyses of the activation strain model in the two cases. It was also found that the rationale about the low ionization energy of α-nucleophile inducing the α-effect was not widely significant. [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
KW - Methanol-microsolvation
KW - Modified G4(MP2) method
KW - Oxy-nucleophiles
KW - Reactivity
KW - SN2 reactions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019910592&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019910592&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1007/s00894-017-3351-7
DO - 10.1007/s00894-017-3351-7
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 1610-2940
VL - 23
JO - Journal of Molecular Modeling
JF - Journal of Molecular Modeling
IS - 192
M1 - 192
ER -