Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mergers of complements, endogenous product differentiation and welfare

  • Tien-Der Han
  • , Arijit Mukherjee*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

40 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

The static analysis shows that a merger among complementary input suppliers or complementary patent holders benefits the consumers and the society by reducing the input prices. We show that the effects of a merger of complements are not so straightforward in a dynamic set up with endogenous product differentiation in the final goods market. The merger of complements reduces the total input prices and increases product differentiation. However, whether it increases or decreases consumer surplus and welfare depends on the market expansion following product differentiation, the number of merged input suppliers and the intensity of competition. Hence, in a dynamic setup with endogenous product differentiation, the antitrust authorities may need to be more careful about mergers of complements. Our analysis has also relevance for vertical mergers. © 2023 The Author(s).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-41
JournalMathematical Social Sciences
Volume126
Online published15 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023
Externally publishedYes

Research Keywords

  • Complementary inputs
  • Consumer surplus
  • Merger
  • Patent pool
  • Product differentiation
  • Welfare

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mergers of complements, endogenous product differentiation and welfare'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this