TY - JOUR
T1 - Memory Denied: A Commentary on the Reports of the UN Special Rapporteur in the Field of Cultural Rights on Historical and Memorial Narratives in Divided Societies
AU - CHOW, Pok Yin Stephenson
N1 - Full text of this publication does not contain sufficient affiliation information. With consent from the author(s) concerned, the Research Unit(s) information for this record is based on the existing academic department affiliation of the author(s).
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - This article critically examines the current efforts of the UN Human Rights Council to articulate normative standards on two delicate issues: history and memory. From the addressing right to historical education, to a communities right to know the truth of serious human rights violations, this article critically appraises the significance of the above efforts in post-conflict and divided societies as well as their wider implications to human rights education and conflict prevention. Throughout the paragraphs, this article addresses fundamental questions about the current undertakings: is it desirable and practicable to articulate normative principles on history and memory? Can the law protect something as contested as history or as vague as collective memories? In conclusion, it argues for the articulation of concrete duties and obligations pertaining to the right of a community to remember its past and adds a new dimension to the on-going discussion on what is commonly referred to as “the right to memory.”
AB - This article critically examines the current efforts of the UN Human Rights Council to articulate normative standards on two delicate issues: history and memory. From the addressing right to historical education, to a communities right to know the truth of serious human rights violations, this article critically appraises the significance of the above efforts in post-conflict and divided societies as well as their wider implications to human rights education and conflict prevention. Throughout the paragraphs, this article addresses fundamental questions about the current undertakings: is it desirable and practicable to articulate normative principles on history and memory? Can the law protect something as contested as history or as vague as collective memories? In conclusion, it argues for the articulation of concrete duties and obligations pertaining to the right of a community to remember its past and adds a new dimension to the on-going discussion on what is commonly referred to as “the right to memory.”
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 0020-7810
VL - 48
SP - 191
EP - 213
JO - The International Lawyer
JF - The International Lawyer
IS - 3
ER -