Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Measures of individual differences in adult theory of mind: A systematic review

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

47 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

Theory of mind (ToM), the ability to understand and reason about mental states, has been extensively studied in young children and clinical populations. A growing interest in examining ToM in adults has emerged over the past two decades, but the extent to which existing measures are suitable for studying adults, especially in detecting individual differences, remains understudied. In this systematic review of 273 studies, 75 measures used to investigate individual differences in adults' ToM were identified. Their sensitivity to individual differences, reliability, and validity were examined. Results suggest that ceiling effects were prevalent, and there was limited evidence to establish the reliability or validity of these measures due to the lack of reports of psychometric properties. Interrelations among measures were inconsistent. These findings highlight the need for future empirical and theoretical work to broaden the evidence base regarding psychometric properties of measures, to develop new measures, and to lay out more specific hypotheses about the relevance of ToM for different social outcomes. © 2023 The Authors
Original languageEnglish
Article number105481
Number of pages28
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume157
Online published28 Nov 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2024
Externally publishedYes

Research Keywords

  • Theory of mind
  • Advanced theory of mind
  • Measurement
  • Systematic review
  • Individual differences
  • Mentalising

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measures of individual differences in adult theory of mind: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this