Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Material Passports in Construction Waste Management: A Systematic Review of Contexts, Stakeholders, Requirements, and Challenges

  • Lawrence Martin Mankata*
  • , Prince Antwi-Afari*
  • , Samuel Frimpong
  • , S. Thomas Ng
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

137 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

The growth in the adoption of circular economy principles in the construction industry has given rise to material passports as a critical implementation tool. Given the existing problems of high resource use and high waste generation in the construction industry, there is a pressing need to adopt novel strategies and tools to mitigate the adverse impacts of the built environment. However, research on the application of material passports in the context of construction waste management remains limited. The aim of this paper is to identify the contextual uses, stakeholders, requirements, and challenges in the application of material passports for managing waste generated from building construction and demolition processes through a systematic review approach. Comprehensive searches in Scopus and the Web of Science databases are used to identify relevant papers and reduce the risk of selection bias. Thirty-five (35) papers are identified and included in the review. The identified key contexts of use included buildings and cities as material banks, waste management and trading, and integrated digital technologies. Asset owners, waste management operators, construction and deconstruction teams, technology providers, and regulatory and sustainability teams are identified as key stakeholders. Data requirements related to material, components, building stock data, lifecycle, environmental impact data, and deconstruction and handling data are critical. Moreover, the key infrastructure requirements include modeling and analytical tools, collaborative information exchange systems, sensory tracking tools, and digital and physical storage hubs. However, challenges with data management, costs, process standardization, technology, stakeholder collaboration, market demand, and supply chain logistics still limit the implementation. Therefore, it is recommended that future research be directed towards certification and standardization protocols, automation, artificial intelligence tools, economic viability, market trading, and innovative end-use products.

© 2025 by the authors.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1825
Number of pages22
JournalBuildings
Volume15
Issue number11
Online published26 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Funding

This work was supported by the Green Tech Fund (GTF) of the Environment and Ecology Bureau of Hong Kong (Grant No.: GTF202110158), the General Research Fund (GRF) of the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (Grant No.: GRF11209123), and the Early Mid-Career Research Grant of the Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Technology, University of Adelaide (Grant No.: 13137501).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  3. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
  4. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Research Keywords

  • material passport
  • construction waste management
  • circular economy
  • contexts
  • stakeholders
  • requirements
  • challenges

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

RGC Funding Information

  • RGC-funded

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Material Passports in Construction Waste Management: A Systematic Review of Contexts, Stakeholders, Requirements, and Challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this