Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Market Competition, Audit Fee Stickiness, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

Abstract

This study examines how audit fee stickiness varies with changes in market competition in China and its effect on audit quality. The Chinese audit market structure has changed significantly since the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants (CICPA) issued a proposal to enhance the competitiveness of large domestic audit firms by promoting the consolidation of domestic audit firms in 2007. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms, we find a decrease in upward stickiness and an increase in downward stickiness as market concentration increases in the post-Proposal period. The asymmetry between upward and downward fee stickiness is greater in local markets that are more dominated by the top 10 domestic auditors. Moreover, we find that upward (downward) fee stickiness has a negative (positive) association with audit quality as measured by earnings management and auditor reporting conservatism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-99
JournalAuditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
Volume38
Issue number2
Online publishedJun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Bibliographical note

Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.

Research Keywords

  • audit fee stickiness
  • audit quality
  • China
  • CICPA
  • market competition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Market Competition, Audit Fee Stickiness, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this