Abstract
In this article, we examine the regulatory mechanisms governing post public employment in Britain and Hong Kong in the context of changing views on how integrity should be managed in their civil services. In both places, new public management practices have increased the possibility of 'soft' conflicts of interest which in turn has resulted in debates over the necessary degree of regulation, the organizational form that this should take, and the extent to which ethical concerns should be more focused on the communication and inculcation of core values in civil servants. We argue that the difficulty of regulating 'soft' conflicts of interests is driving moves toward the greater centralisation of ethical regulation in both Britain and Hong Kong and that there appears to be a return to more traditional ways of managing integrity. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 365-380 |
| Journal | Public Organization Review |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Research Keywords
- Conflict of interest
- Ethical regulation
- Post public employment
- Public service ethos
- Trust in government
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Managing integrity: The regulation of post public employment in Britain and Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver