Abstract
Of the countries hit by the Asian economic crisis in 1997, Malaysia was the least hurt. The government was thus initially able to reject neo-liberal prescriptions, instead administering capital controls and corporate bailouts. However, despite short-term success, different kinds of foreign investors, top politicians and business elites, and mass-level constituencies gradually forced wide policy swings. Facing contrary pressures, the government fluctuated between 'orthodox' regimens of neo-liberal reforms and good governance agendas on one side and patronage and corrupt practices on the other. This article analyses these fluctuations, then speculates that re-equilibration may have recently have taken place. © 2005 Taylor & Francis Ltd.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 284-309 |
| Journal | Journal of Development Studies |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Malaysia: New reforms, old continuities, tense ambiguities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver