Making sense of the victim’s role in clemency decision making

Daniel Pascoe*, Marie Manikis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

This article discusses victim engagement with the executive clemency process from a normative perspective. The authors’ aim is to explore the existing models of victim participation in clemency decision making in common law jurisdictions, in order to determine whether these possess any sound theoretical basis. The article brings together the academic literatures on victim participation and clemency functionality in order to ground the analysis. In brief, the authors' main finding is that victim involvement in clemency decision making can indeed be supported by the theoretical literature, albeit to a more limited extent than is currently practised in some common law jurisdictions. In light of the theoretical underpinnings of clemency in democratic societies and the literature on victim participation, the authors conclude by making several ‘best practice’ recommendations for future policy-making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-28
JournalInternational Review of Victimology
Volume25
Issue number1
Online published9 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

Research Keywords

  • clemency
  • commutation
  • pardon
  • participation
  • procedural rights
  • substantive rights
  • Victims

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making sense of the victim’s role in clemency decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this