Abstract
This article investigates the Neo-Confucian discourse on war, premised on the “Chinese versus barbarian” binary, and its impact on the Neo-Confucian scholar-officials of 17th-century Chosŏn Korea. It shows that Korean Neo-Confucians suffered invasions from the Jurchens, who they regarded as “barbarians,” and that the political debate on how to respond to the “barbarians” drove the advocates of the pro-peace argument to reimagine Chosŏn’s statehood. The article consists of three parts. First, it reconstructs the philosophical foundations of the mainstream Neo-Confucian discourse on the war with the “barbarians” with reference to Zhu Xi. Second, it discusses the strong impact of the Neo-Confucian paradigm of war on the orthodox Korean Neo-Confucians of the 17th century. Third, it examines how Ch’oe Myŏng-kil, one of the rare champions of the pro-peace argument at the time, justified making peace with the Jurchens through the judicious use of “the expedient.” © The Author(s) 2020.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 117–140 |
| Journal | European Journal of Political Theory |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Online published | 16 Nov 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2023 |
Research Keywords
- Ch’oi Myŏng-kil
- expedient
- Korea
- Neo-Confucianism
- Zhu Xi
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Making peace with the barbarians: Neo-Confucianism and the pro-peace argument in 17th-century Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver