Making peace with the barbarians : Neo-Confucianism and the pro-peace argument in 17th-century Korea
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 117–140 |
Journal / Publication | European Journal of Political Theory |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 1 |
Online published | 16 Nov 2020 |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2023 |
Link(s)
Abstract
This article investigates the Neo-Confucian discourse on war, premised on the “Chinese versus barbarian” binary, and its impact on the Neo-Confucian scholar-officials of 17th-century Chosŏn Korea. It shows that Korean Neo-Confucians suffered invasions from the Jurchens, who they regarded as “barbarians,” and that the political debate on how to respond to the “barbarians” drove the advocates of the pro-peace argument to reimagine Chosŏn’s statehood. The article consists of three parts. First, it reconstructs the philosophical foundations of the mainstream Neo-Confucian discourse on the war with the “barbarians” with reference to Zhu Xi. Second, it discusses the strong impact of the Neo-Confucian paradigm of war on the orthodox Korean Neo-Confucians of the 17th century. Third, it examines how Ch’oe Myŏng-kil, one of the rare champions of the pro-peace argument at the time, justified making peace with the Jurchens through the judicious use of “the expedient.”
Research Area(s)
- Ch’oi Myŏng-kil, expedient, Korea, Neo-Confucianism, Zhu Xi
Citation Format(s)
Making peace with the barbarians : Neo-Confucianism and the pro-peace argument in 17th-century Korea. / Kim, Sungmoon.
In: European Journal of Political Theory, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.2023, p. 117–140.Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review