Losses from horizontal merger and collusion

Hamid Beladi, Arijit Mukherjee*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

17 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

We show that the implications of a merger on collusion sustainability change significantly from the extant literature if merger is not profitable in the punishment subgame where firms play non-cooperative Cournot–Nash game. Merger either does not affect collusion sustainability or it may decrease or increase collusion sustainability, depending on the output allocation for the merged firm. Our paper has the following implication for antitrust policies. If merger is observed, the authority will expect an industry-wide collusion, since merger will occur in our analysis provided it increases collusion sustainability. © The Author(s) 2024.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-289
JournalJournal of Economics/ Zeitschrift fur Nationalokonomie
Volume142
Issue number3
Online published1 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2024
Externally publishedYes

Research Keywords

  • Collusion
  • Cournot–Nash
  • Merger

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Losses from horizontal merger and collusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this