Legitimized interference with private properties - Banking Act 2009

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Argues that the powers granted by the Banking Act 2009 under the special resolution regime (SRR) to deal with ailing financial institutions interfere with the market economy theory and restructure the private property rights of those holding property in a failing bank, but are legitimised on the grounds of public interest. Reviews academic theories on the scope of the property right, the operation of the SRR and its impact on the property rights of shareholders and depositors. Explains why the powers should be seen as being in line with the Human Rights Act 1998. © 2022 Sweet & Maxwell and its Contributors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-234
JournalJournal of International Banking Law and Regulation
Volume25
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Research Keywords

  • Banking supervision
  • Banks
  • Human rights
  • Proprietary rights
  • Special resolution regime

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Legitimized interference with private properties - Banking Act 2009'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this