Legitimacy and policing: A systematic review

Lorraine Mazerolle*, Sarah Bennett, Jacqueline Davis, Elise Sargeant, Matthew Manning

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

This Campbell systematic review assesses the direct and indirect benefits of public police interventions that use procedurally just dialogue. The review summarises findings from 30 studies conducted in Australia, the USA and England. The participants were individuals (citizen, victim, offender etc.), groups (e.g. community) and third parties (e.g. religious advisors).

Police-led interventions specifically aimed at increasing legitimacy have a significant impact on public satisfaction with and confidence in the police. Such interventions are also associated with significantly increased public compliance/cooperation, procedural justice (fairness, neutrality, etc.) and legitimacy (obligation to obey police/law). Interventions also had a minor effect on reoffending. © 2013 Mazerolle et al.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages147
JournalCampbell Systematic Reviews
Volume2013
Issue number1
Online published2 Jan 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Funding

We would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA), George Mason University and the Campbell Collaboration which made this systematic search and review possible.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Legitimacy and policing: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this