Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Jurisdiction under the Hague Convention on choice of court agreements: a critique

  • Sai Ramani Garimella*
  • , Poomintr Sooksripaisarnkit*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

The Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements entered into force in 28 Contracting States, including Mexico and all the Member States of the European Union, except Denmark, on 1 October 2015. Singapore ratified the Convention on 2 June 2016 and the Convention applies between Singapore and the other Contracting States from 1 October 2016. The Convention was drafted with ambitious goals to increase judicial co-operation on issues of jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. Having examined provisions of the Convention relation to the jurisdictional issue, however, the authors argue in this article that these provisions are likely to produce outcomes that are in stark contrast with the overall goal of the Convention.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)309–336
JournalIndian Journal of International Law
Volume57
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017
Externally publishedYes

Research Keywords

  • Choice of court agreements
  • Jurisdiction
  • Forum non conveniens
  • Hague Convention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Jurisdiction under the Hague Convention on choice of court agreements: a critique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this