Abstract
Recent international jurisprudence has shown considerable uncertainty with regard to the delimitation of the territorial sea. While international tribunals endorse a two-stage approach to territorial sea delimitation, there is a lack of judicial consensus on the practical implementation of such an approach. This article argues that the rule-exception relationship between equidistance and special circumstances, as reflected in the drafting history of LOSC Article 15 and in jurisprudence prior to 2007, should inform the delimitation of the territorial sea. Cases since 2007 which have strayed from the earlier jurisprudence on LOSC Article 15, should be seen as a misconstruction of the law applicable to territorial sea delimitation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 589-623 |
| Number of pages | 35 |
| Journal | International and Comparative Law Quarterly |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Online published | 15 May 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Research Keywords
- International Court of Justice
- International Law Commission
- International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
- maritime boundaries
- maritime delimitation
- territorial sea
- UNCLOS
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Judicial Uncertainties concerning Territorial Sea Delimitation under Article 15 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver