Twenty Two (2015): A sentimental, fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) of the comfort women?

Shuoyuzhou Li, Mecca Jing Li, Zeyuan Wu, Ruofeng Xu, Yue Huang, Xia Xiaoyu* (Translator), Yvonne Lin* (Translator)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsComment/debatepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This is an excerpt of the roundtable discussion on Twenty Two (Er shi er, 2015) organized by Deep Focus and was originally published on August 31, 2017. Following the delayed release of the documentary in 2017, as it deals with the sensitive subject matter of China’s surviving WWII comfort women, the roundtable addressed the aesthetic and ethical debates that this commercially successful documentary sparked: Whether the use of pillow shots is poetic or pointless? Is Twenty Two best understood as a sentimental, superficial “fast-moving consumer-goods documentary” of the comfort women? Is Twenty Two a good (technically accomplished) or bad (aesthetically and morally problematic) film? The panelists pointed out that the documentary fails to attend to gendered issues, historical reflections, and the violence of revictimization.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)226-235
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Chinese Cinemas
Volume15
Issue number2-3
Online published16 Nov 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Research Keywords

  • comfort women
  • fast-moving consumer-goods documentary
  • revictimization
  • The Act of Killing
  • Thirty Two
  • Twenty Two

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Twenty Two (2015): A sentimental, fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) of the comfort women?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this